- Information
U.S. Capitalists’ Dogfight: Small Fry Use Racist Tea Party to Snarl Big Bosses’ War Aims
- Information
- 22 July 2010 489 hits
A widening split within the U.S. ruling class is intensifying between two groups of capitalists. The dominant wing is led by the Rockefeller interests — which includes such giant corporations as Exxon-Mobil and JP Morgan Chase — and which champions the long-range interests of U.S. capitalism. They promote imperialist wars internationally, attempting to maintain U.S. top-dog status in their drive to control the world’s resources (especially oil and gas), markets and the ability to exploit impoverished workers. They must, sooner or later, mobilize the nation to confront rivals Iran, China and Russia which are bent on expanding their own access to these resources. China has now become the world’s number one energy user.
To accomplish this they must impose wartime discipline on a challenging anti-Rockefeller faction, basically capitalists more focused on immediate, short-range profits — the quarterly bottom line — than on the long-term needs of U.S. imperialism. It is these domestically-oriented bosses who have been bankrolling and organizing a mass, anti-tax, predominantly Republican faction known as the Tea Party (“Taxed Enough Already”).
This fight between these two capitalist wings is nothing new. As PLP has been exposing for decades, the Rockefeller group, long identified as “old money” — centered in the East and in the big Wall Street banks and investment houses — has dominated U.S. capitalism for much of the last century. The domestically-oriented group, identified as “new money,” emerged in the post-Kennedy era, backing Nixon, and has been centered in the South and West.
The destruction of the Nixon presidency in the early 1970s marked the victory of “old money” over “new money.” But the fight continues.
Now along comes Charles Kupchan and Peter Trubowitz, writing in “International Security” (Summer, 2010) to confirm what PLP has been saying: “[P]olitical polarization has been shaking the domestic foundations of U.S. grand strategy, sorely testing bipartisan support for liberal internationalism — the grand strategy that guided the United States from World War II through the end of the Cold War….” There, in a nutshell, lies one of the gravest challenges facing Obama and the U.S. imperialists he serves.
Kupchan-Trubowitz “define the liberal internationalist compact as the combination of heavy investment in military force with a commitment to international institutions.” Kupchan and Trubovitz’s remarks appeared in a Harvard publication. The Rockefeller-led Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) circulated them. Harvard and the CFR are top policy factories for the Rockefeller wing.
Big Bosses Need Ever Wider Wars
The only road for the biggest U.S. capitalists to maintain their international domination is through ever wider wars. But imposing wartime discipline on the entire U.S. capitalist class, a necessity for its Rockefeller imperialist faction, is proving difficult for Obama amid an economic crisis. Wars require taxes, while a bitter fight seethes over ending or extending massive Bush, Jr.-era tax cuts, set to expire on January 1. November’s Congressional elections revolve largely around this question. And this is the reason that anti-Rockefeller capitalists have been organizing and financing the mass, anti-tax Tea Party.
Its chief intellectual and organizational assistance comes from Americans for Prosperity, funded by Koch Industries and FreedomWorks, headed by Koch-protégé Dick Armey. Koch Industries is a huge, family-held, domestically-oriented energy and timber company. The Kochs have long railed against money-burning U.S. overseas wars that gain them nothing. Recent articles on the Koch-funded Cato Institute website include: “Time to Leave Iraq,”; “The Case for Withdrawal from Afghanistan”; and “U.S. Out of South Korea.”
Armey — after retiring from Congress, where he antagonized the Clinton regime — joined the Koch’s anti-tax Citizens for a Sound Economy as co-chairman. He then toiled for the Washington lobbying firm DLA Piper, seeking to neutralize Iran “on the cheap,” without the costly U.S.-led attack/embargo/invasion the imperialist wing foresees. From 2005 to 2009 at DLA Piper, Armey promoted the People’s Mojahedin Organization of Iran, a group (labeled terrorist by the State Department) that was supposed to overthrow the anti-U.S. ayatollahs in Teheran.
Tea Partyism makes U.S. imperialists very afraid. Kupchan and Trubowitz fear that “the partisan gap that widened during George W. Bush’s administration has continued during the presidency of Barack Obama, confirming that a structural change has taken place in the domestic bases of U.S. foreign policy.” From the imperialists’ viewpoint, that gap has spelled frustration and disaster: half-baked invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan followed by undermanned occupations that can’t get oil pumped or pipelines built.
Troops, Public Don’t Back Liberals’ War Plans
Leslie Gelb, ex-CFR chairman, noted a more ominous partisan gap among the troops U.S. rulers must rely on. He boiled General McChrystal’s attack on the Obama gang to a plain, simple fact: “The U.S. military, officers and enlisted ranks don’t like and don’t trust Democrats and liberals. The bad feelings are mainly about values, style and constancy more than policy.” (“Daily Beast,” 6/22) Gelb feared an ensuing “firestorm of criticism [within the armed forces] about the White House, perhaps reaching Tea Party proportions.”
In addition to questionable loyalty to the liberal war agenda amid the military, there is the general population’s waning support for armed intervention. A December 2009 Pew poll revealed that 49% of the public believed that the United States “should mind its own business” — the highest response to that question ever recorded, far surpassing the 32% in 1972, at the height of opposition to the U.S. imperialist invasion of Vietnam.
Tea Partiers Open Racists; Liberal Imperialists Genocidal and Racist Butchers
So, to steer opinion their way, liberals, such as the NAACP, attack Tea Partiers (TP) as racist for their overwhelmingly-white composition and anti-immigrant stance. The TP movement is indeed racist. But its liberal imperialist opponents stand guilty of racist genocide.
For over two decades they have slaughtered over a million Iraqis for oil and regularly kill Afghan civilians over a gas pipeline. Over decades of war after war — Korea, Vietnam, Cambodia, Guatemala, Chile, Grenada, Panama, Nicaragua, not to mention the CIA-trained death squads in Latin America and the deaths due to U.S. corporate exploitation of the world’s oil and minerals — U.S. “liberal internationalists” have murdered more workers than Hitler’s sadists could ever have dreamed of. Atrocities like the quarter-million slaughtered by atom-bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki, as well as the tortures and killings at My Lai, and Abu Ghraib, punctuate their unceasing deadly search for profits through military conquest.
The Tea Party and its capitalist backers deserve the wrath of the working class. We must continue to attack both the racist Tea Party and the far more murderous liberal killers that Obama represents. They remain our class’s greatest enemy because they have the ability to deceive many by posing as a lesser evil.
It is the task of a mass, working-class party to organize in every area of the world in which our Party fights — in every factory, union, barracks, school, church, community and mass organization — to turn all working-class struggles into “schools for communism,” and build the only force than can destroy the capitalist beasts. Such is the goal of the revolutionary communist PLP. Join us!
- Information
Angry Drivers Put Brakes on Hacks’ Loyalty to Bosses’ Laws
- Information
- 22 July 2010 519 hits
OAKLAND, CA, JULY 18 — Hundreds of East Bay Area transit workers streamed into the union hall yesterday for a special meeting amid a buzz of righteous anger over an unprecedented company attack: imposing a new contract and work schedules. Many arrived seeking a plan of action, but the Amalgamated Transit Union (ATU) leadership offered nothing. One driver declared, “Man, we walked in here mad…strong like some dark coffee, but they just kept watering it down until it was like some weak herbal tea…and they got us drinking it!”
Union Pushes for Arbitration; Sign-up Boycott Successful
AC Transit carries about 230,000 people daily in the East Bay. Our contract expired June 30. Though for months the union president mouthed the possibility of a strike and members took a unanimous strike vote, nothing was organized. Then, a newspaper told us our union was asking for binding arbitration, ignoring a strike. Our international dispatched a representative to convince us this was the right course, promising that during arbitration, we’d continue under our old contract.
Meanwhile, the company threatened to impose their contract on July 18, demanding we “sign up” (choose our work assignments) on runs that completely violate our contract. The union asked drivers to boycott the sign-up. In a great show of solidarity, everyone boycotted. We all believed there was no way we would work these runs.
But on July 16, when the union asked the court for arbitration, they “forgot” to ask to remain under the old contract. The judge used this technicality to order the new contract be in force until a Tuesday, July 20 hearing.
Union Bets on Court System, Not Drivers’ Action
As yesterday’s meeting began, drivers expected an action plan. As one young driver texted: “I think we should strike…. By doing this [signing up] they mess up a lot of people…. Hey, I think we should do like New York transit did — strike even if the court still said no!....” Another said: “People ain’t gonna work these runs…. My wife works here too and we always work different schedules so we can pick up the kids. We can’t let them do this to us. I’m staying off work until Tuesday.”
One dispatcher and several drivers suggested we all show up to work Sunday but demand to work on the runs WE had chosen, not those the company chose for us. The union president and her “smart” lawyers said no. We now see that the union is relying on courts, lawyers and arbitrators, not on the kind of workers’ solidarity we saw on the day of the sign-up. The International wants to put out fires, not start them!
Another young driver declared, “When the verdict was announced for the cop that killed Oscar Grant [see letter, page 6), his uncle said the family felt they’d been slapped in the face by the system. Well, right now, we’re getting slapped in the face, and our union seems to be telling us to turn the other cheek. As long as we rely on their court system, this will keep happening. We’re being disrespected, spit on, stepped on. There’s no way we should work these runs!”
President Talks ‘Faith’ to Avoid Talking Business
Then the union president said, “I’m a believer in the Lord Jesus Christ and the bible does say you must obey the law of the land....These laws were originally established by God, but man messed them up.”
But not everyone agrees with her use of “faith.” As one driver said later, “She’s using that ‘faith’ stuff as a smokescreen, to get people on her side. If you want to testify, go to church. We come here to deal with our business…. I remember what you said last time, this is like a war, and we’re the front-line soldiers. We’re supposed to have a battle plan.”
The union’s real “faith” is faith in the capitalist legal system. We communists point out that the legal system is stacked for the rich capitalists. As one driver put it, “They [the courts] always tend to side with the big corporation.” Instead of relying on the bosses’ legal system, communists try to build workers’ power through education, solidarity, action, building PLP and eventually revolution.
As things got watered down, some drivers were drinking the “weak herbal tea,” but others were ready for action. So many drivers didn’t show up for work that 25 runs were cancelled at one division and 10-15 at another.
In the Class War, Communists Fight To Win
Nationwide, transit workers are under attack. This is war. While the International keeps playing softball, communists believe we need hardball. Through this struggle, we want to win more workers to consider fighting this war to the finish: a revolution to destroy capitalism.
- Information
‘Jobs, Not Jails!’ — Jobless Youth Confront State Power
- Information
- 22 July 2010 495 hits
BALTIMORE, July 8 — Today, young people learned an important lesson about state power during an angry and well-organized rally against massive cuts in summer jobs. Last Monday, about 9,000 students, who had registered months earlier with YouthWorks, were supposed to start working at their sites. However, at the last minute, approximately 3,000 of these students were informed that they had no job at all!
That Tuesday one of the youth organizations led a militant sit-in at YouthWorks headquarters, blocking the front doors for about two hours as supporters rallied and chanted. The head of YouthWorks, all of whose offices were essentially shut down for most of the morning, invited a couple of protest leaders to come upstairs to meet with her. Protesters refused, insisting that she come down and talk with the whole group.
Nervous and defensive, she finally did come down, claiming to have the students’ interests at heart, and said there’s no more money for any more jobs. She did agree to a small “concession,” that she would reconsider applications of students in the protesting group, and place some of them on a waiting list. They will then get jobs, she promised, if some students at other sites decide not to work for YouthWorks.
At today’s City Hall rally, students held their ground as they faced off with cops barring the doorway. For nearly two hours, student leaders maintained rock-solid courage, arguing face-to-face with the cops that they have no right to keep us out, and demanding to see Mayor Rawlings-Blake. At the same time, a larger group of students in the rally chanted “Are you angry! Yes!” and “We don’t want your pity! We want money for our city!” Another powerful chant was “Jobs yes! Jails no!” Maryland is spending $104 million to build a new youth jail in Baltimore City, but won’t spend just $3.6 million to employ the 3,000 youth who were denied summer jobs. The organization leading today’s protest has been fighting this school-to-prison pipeline all spring, and continued that struggle today.
Mayor Rawlings-Blake never came out, but City Council President Young did. He asked for two student leaders to come inside, go with him to his office, and represent the group. The students again refused, demanding that he stay outside and talk with everyone! He responded that it was too hot outside. What arrogance, after we’d already been in the 90-degree heat for two hours!
Finally, recognizing our unwillingness to be divided, he stayed outside and talked for a few minutes before walking off hurriedly to his limousine. He claimed to be on our side, to be working hard to fund youth jobs, and that he opposes the new juvenile jail. When asked what he’s doing right now to get jobs for the 3,000 young people who’ve been left out on the street, he angrily said it’s an unfair question; that he doesn’t have the power to make it happen.
One strong bit of truth emerged. Young said he had been trying, virtually begging, to get Johns Hopkins — Baltimore’s largest private employer — along with major businesses, to provide more summer jobs for youth. As a PL’er pointed out, speaking to the rally a few minutes later, there’s a profound lesson in Young’s remarks. It became clear that Baltimore’s big businesses are more powerful than the city government, because — even if just pretending to care about youth jobs — government officials have to go begging to big business. The capitalists are the top dogs who really hold power. The government is simply a tool of the bosses.
We also saw that the cops blocking the doors to City Hall, and all the other cops on the sidewalk who were ready to lock us up, are serving the needs of the bosses. Threatening to use the jails and the courts — if they had arrested us — would keep many of us jobless, but under control. This is called state power.
A PL’er at the rally pointed out that in school they teach us it’s a democracy, but that in reality, it’s a dictatorship of the capitalist class. They use their state power — the government, the cops, the jails, and the courts — to oppress our class, the working class. The PL’er also put forward that only a revolution for communism can create a world that is run by the working class and truly serves our needs, with jobs for all. Just about everybody gladly took copies of CHALLENGE, and some donated money. The vigorous fight for jobs will continue, and so will PLP’s fight for a world free of wage slavery!
- Information
Teachers’ Convention: PL’ers Help Lead Fight vs. Union Machine’s Stomping on Students
- Information
- 22 July 2010 508 hits
SEATTLE, July 11 — Progressive Labor Party members played important roles in the biannual convention of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) ending here today. We helped lead a rally exposing the Obama Administration’s Secretary of Education Arne Duncan and a walkout and rally against billionaire Bill Gates. We helped organize and spoke at three forums held by the AFT Peace and Justice Caucus, distributed 600 CHALLENGES, 300 Juneteenth Anti-Racism Supplements and 4,000 leaflets to delegates.
We helped the Peace and Justice Caucus recruit for forums on Haiti, on the fight-back against the racist, anti-working class Race to the Top competition and on Afghanistan and Gaza. They were attended by many rank-and-file delegates. The discussions there raised interesting questions about fights against the ruling class and built ties between delegates. (See box page 7)
The militant walkout against Gates was caused by Party members having political conversations with their friends and others in general meetings about why we should oppose his presence at a union convention. Gates is spending lots of money through his foundation to make changes in education. While he first used his money to help build small schools, now he’s focusing on “teacher quality.” The AFT leadership invited him because he’s already given millions to four school districts for pilot projects.
Gates uses his foundation’s money to influence policies that attack teachers and students. Smaller schools often exclude students with the greatest needs — special education students, English-language learners and many students whose neighborhood schools have closed. Through actions like “school turnaround,” as we’ve seen in Chicago, the Board of Education fires the school’s staff. Then lower-paid, inexperienced teachers are hired in their places — in urban areas the firings are racist because a disproportionate number of black teachers lose their jobs in the process.
At the same time, students are hurt, now having younger, inexperienced teachers, rather than teachers with skills in managing a classroom and teaching their subjects. The reorganization of the schools also resegregates the schools. The AFT has conceded this battle everywhere — only the organization of angry workers in NY, Chicago, Rhode Island, and Washington, D.C. has led to any defeat of the ruling-class’s attacks.
Due to the dysfunction of so many schools in many cities, parents are choosing charter schools and the smaller schools. Studies show that these new schools aren’t doing any better than the original schools. However, parents are desperate to find what they hope are better schools for their children. The major weakness in these education struggles is the lack of a teacher-parent-student alliance.
The AFT is tightly controlled by the leadership of its NYC local (UFT), and struggle against the pro-ruling-class line of the AFT is difficult. The AFT refuses to criticize U.S. foreign policy. Their Afghanistan resolution was filled with outright lies — such as the U.S. being “drawn into” supporting the government of Hamid Karzai.
Delegates, friends and members of PL and others, fought hard to brand the war in Afghanistan a war for resources, especially oil and gas, rather than a war against terrorism. Other AFT resolutions build plans for further collaboration between the union, politicians and the ruling class. For the union, these conventions are important tools to help win members to the ruling-class’s political agenda — for war and fascism, building patriotism to convince working-class students to fight and die for oil.
Party members on the convention floor and in committee meetings analyzed the situation in Chicago Public Schools, where a rank-and-file caucus has won the leadership of the 35,000-member local and tied poor school conditions to the failure of international capitalism. Some of our ideas took the form of resolutions for debate, which provided talking points for political discussions with teachers and allows us to sharpen our struggles with people we know well.
We held a PLP picnic, bringing friends of the Party to a Seattle park to learn more about our Party and our organizing against the ruling-class attacks. We must build close ties with other workers. PL members spent time with teachers having discussions over lunch and breakfast about the Party and the need to bring revolutionary ideas to our parent, teacher and student relationships.
From the classroom, to the caucus meetings, to the convention floor, to parent conferences, communist teachers must continue to seize opportunities to build the Party. Our Party was essential to the organization of the rank-and-file opposition forces at the convention, providing tactical and political leadership.
Our literature provided ideas and analysis about issues specific to education and also tied those issues to the broader world situations of increasing war and fascism. Our leaflet about the BP oil spill explained how we can’t rely on the ruling-class’s government to solve our problems — either in the Gulf or in the schools. Our comrades led struggle, made new political friends and built stronger ties with old friends.
Overall, the convention was a success for the Party. The recent developments in the Chicago Teachers Union have created opportunities for Party members to focus our work in the AFT while broadening our base among large numbers of workers who are students, parents and fellow teachers. Concentrating on the goal of building the Party and communist relationships while working in the bosses’ organizations challenges us all. Our collective strength and our confidence in the workers will guide us on the road to revolution.
- Information
Haiti: NGOs Live High Off the Hog While Troops Abuse Workers
- Information
- 22 July 2010 478 hits
The AFT Peace and Justice Caucus sponsored a forum on the after-effects of the earthquake in Haiti. There was much debate after two teachers from Haiti spoke about the
efforts of rank-and-file workers to improve conditions in Haiti.
The forum revealed that many workers have illusions, fostered by the media and the U.S.
government, that the UN “peacekeeping” forces and the non-governmental organizations (NGOs), like the Red Cross, are the good guys.
At the forum educators from Haiti stated that these NGO workers in Haiti live off the NGO’s U.S.dollars, drive around in large dark SUVs with tinted windows, and live in big houses. The desperation for U.S. dollars has led to an increase in prostitution paid for by this NGO money. Friends from Haiti warned that if workers want to send money to Haiti we should find workers to send it to, and not send money to the NGOs to steal. And while we’ve all been told that the UN forces are the saviors of the working class in Haiti, we heard reports of the UN troops abusing and terrorizing young men there.
A PLP member from the Dominican Republic called for the unity of the working class to over-throw the yoke of U.S. Imperialism in Haiti and around the world.
At the forum about fighting back against the Race to the Top (RTTT) competition, the panelists described their fights against attacks on educators and students. Unfortunately, too many of the panelists described their struggles merely to get more tax money to pay for schools during this period of capitalist crisis. However, that just means taxing the working class, not the bosses, and it does not suspend payments to the banks. No matter how the budgets are cut everywhere, the debt service (money to banks to pay back debts) is never cut. Another serious weakness in the RTTT forum was the lack of discussion of the affects of RTTT and budget cuts on students, and the lack of any clear call for unity between parents, students and educators.
We should continue these kinds of discussions, continuing to bring our line to honest educators, parents, and students, to build our movement.
